Tuesday, 19 October 2021
British Occult Society
Monday, 18 October 2021
Recollections of the Late David Farrant (concluded)
"What if David, whose life was a hundred percent Highgate Cemetery, what if he is now part of the story but in a different realm?" — Andrew Gough
David Farrant's life was not "a hundred percent Highgate Cemetery," and were his shade to be sighted anywhere, it would be in the Prince of Wales and kindred pubs he gleefully frequented in Highgate. The cemetery was merely a means to an end. In the beginning, it helped him become a focus of attention, having boarded what he perceived to be a potential publicity bandwagon. Andrew Gough visited Farrant at his Muswell Hill bedsit, and included him in a documentary* when I was unwilling to participate in it. Yet, like so many journalists, he did not know Farrant. He only knew the persona Farrant presented.
*
Now there is no longer Farrant to promulgate his "ghost," journalists are attempting to turn the deceased figure of Farrant into a ghost to enable them continue their exploitation of what was a fabricated story in the first place. Farrant didn't even believe in ghosts, and certainly not vampires, but he utilised both to attract the attention of newspapers and the broader media. He had listened to tales of a vampiric entity in the pubs he frequented in Highgate Village after his return from France and Spain to marry his wife in 1967, and, at the turn of 1970, conspired to spook locals with a ghost story of his own. His plan was, after two or three weeks, to expose the ghost in the local newspapers as something he had invented; thus proving that supernatural phenomena was hysteria and not real. To assist in this scheme, he enlisted the help of a handful of acquaintances, many patrons of the Prince of Wales, to write fraudulent correspondence to the editor of the local press. Their fake letters were published, and, sure enough, what appeared to be genuine testimonies followed. By which time Farrant was caught under the armpits and was no longer willing to abide by his original plan. This angered some of those who had helped in the charade. But Farrant now felt himself being carried off by something that soon turned into an addiction to self-publicity. From March 1970, he jumped on the tail-coats of the emerging vampire revelations. His doing so was unwelcome, and I let him know this in no uncertain terms. The rest really is history.
"Alex thinks that the voice he heard [recently in Highgate Cemetery] was Farrant." — Steve HigginsRecollections of the Late David Farrant (continued)
Notwithstanding the combustible public relationship I had with David Farrant, in private we were very civil. There was no reason not to be, as he knew I could not be duped in the way so many others had been. He didn't even try to convince me that he was any of the things he claimed. All his talk of witchcraft was a means to an end. We privately discussed this and he frequently poured scorn on those who subscribed to such things. He certainly bore malice toward the self-proclaimed "King of the Witches," Alex Sanders. I had spoken to Sanders on a London radio station when he was planning to summon a demon on the stage of a Hendon cinema, and found him most respectful toward me. I also later came to personally know his wife, Maxine (to be styled "Queen of the Witches"), plus Janet and Colin Bord (who had been initiated into Alexandrian Witchcraft). These people were friendly toward me. Then again, I gave them no reason to be hostile. Farrant let it be known that he resented them.
I was extremely busy in the 1970s, but managed to stay in touch with Farrant from time to time. He even invited me to be present at some of his stunts, twice incognito. He made no pretence to me that they were anything other than photo opportunities. No genuine ceremony or ritual ever took place, and he could barely keep a straight face when he acted out something whilst being photographed. When I tape-recorded him, however, it was a different matter. He assumed a serious persona because he knew others would hear the recording for which he had given his full consent. I had to talk to him in the third person; otherwise all sense of reality would have flown out of the window.
Despite his incendiary media outbursts, invariably confined to tabloid and local newspapers, to fuel the notion of some fearsome feud, when alone he was cheerful in my company. Naturally, there were exceptions when he overstepped the line, and I took umbrage with good cause, but we were civil privately. Three events would change all that, as the 1970s reached midway and finally drew to a close.
The first was the effect prison had on him. We stayed in touch following his incarceration by corresponding via a third party, a lovely girl by the name of Elspeth who sometimes attended the Old Bailey during his trials and sat in the public gallery. As did I, of course. He wanted me to use a code name; so I did. He wrote care of Elspeth who forwarded his letters to me. I used her address and the code name provided when writing back. When he was eventually released on parole, however, he did not alert me, or tell me where he might be living. This I found strange, to say the least, and, had I not been travelling from Highgate through Muswell Hill to my destination further north, I might never have discovered his new address. It was a multi-occupied house facing Highgate Wood in Muswell Hill.
It was only a matter of time before we made contact, but something had changed about him. I bumped into him on one occasion, as he was walking along the dirt path that runs from Muswell Hill Road to lower Muswell Hill. We spoke for some time. It was during this conversation that he finally opened up about orchestrating "black magic telephone calls" to the Bradish household. This was a major stumbling block between us. It was, for me, why we couldn't be more than acquaintances.
“Self-styled witch king David Farrant – the man jailed for desecrating a tomb and threatening detectives with voodoo – has a new shock in store. What’s more, Britain’s best-known Prince of Darkness is dreaming of a traditional white wedding” (Sunday People, 16 April 1978). The article quoted Farrant saying: “I want to put my ghoulish past behind me now. Either I give up witchcraft or Nancy.” This sounded too good to believe, and, of course, it was. Soon after the story was printed, Farrant gave up Nancy O’Hoski, a speech therapist (Farrant suffered from a nervous stammer). They did not get married. This was a cruel stunt played by Farrant on his fiancée.
I met Nancy O'Hoski on a number of occasions, and found her to be open and honest. If only Farrant had genuinely turned over a new leaf, but she had no idea what was going on, any more than did I.
In the autumn of 1977, she heard Farrant on the telephone to a newspaper reporter where, between them, they conspired to frame me injuriously. The telephone was a house 'phone on the ground floor, just outside Farrant's room. He would later move to the attic on the top floor where he lived until the end of his days. Nancy O'Hoski heard enough of what Farrant was saying to be shocked. She told me that his disloyal and unacceptable behaviour toward me meant that she had seen his real colours, which meant he had not changed one jot or tittle, and was still a wrong 'un. When she read what he had done in the newspaper concerned, their engagement was over and she returned to Canada.
It left a nasty taste in the mouth, of course, but two more events were about to occur that would make any future goodwill impossible. The first was his marriage to Colette Sully at the end of that decade, and his alliance with Jean-Paul Bourre soon afterwards. Bourre, a French Luciferian with a predilection for killing defenceless animals, and Farrant became close friends from December 1979.
What do we know about their brand of Luciferianism? David Farrant informs us in a magazine article called “Witch Report” (Penthouse [UK], Vol. 8, No. 8, 1973, page 19): “Satanists worship Lucifer, the supreme power of evil, whereas witchcraft is a neutral thing — it’s only evil if practised for an evil purpose.” Like several of his Luciferian acquaintances, Jean-Paul Bourre amongst them, Farrant, who had stated that he abandoned witchcraft in 1982, described himself as someone who “accepts Lucifer as an important deity” and that he “worships Lucifer.” He made a video for YouTube where he and a small handful of others, including a naked Colette Sully, went through the motions of a "Red Mass" à la Bourre. We hear Farrant mumbling incantations throughout the ritual, but it is pure gibberish.
And what of Jean-Paul Bourre? Farrant is quite explicit in his earliest self-published pamphlet from which the photograph and caption, below, appear. According to Farrant, his longstanding friend Jean-Paul Bourre is “a leading Satanist” and in the picture Bourre is seen attempting “to invoke the Devil.”
Recollections of the Late David Farrant
The Curse of Parasitic Journalists
Reading through this total misrepresentation of the facts, it would be quicker to single out anything accurately stated by Nicole Lampert in the Mail online which, incidentally, published at exactly the same time the article appeared: "We are no longer accepting comments on this article." They never did, of course, which is why I have with good reason not spoken to a journalist for literally decades. My own writings, documentaries, interviews and recollections give the lie to this cobbled-together travesty which you can read by clicking on the photographs above. The one of me is published by the Mail without my consent. It is not their copyright. The one of Farrant was provided by "Della."
Wednesday, 29 September 2021
Sunday, 15 August 2021
Tuesday, 10 August 2021
Monday, 31 May 2021
Thursday, 8 April 2021
Oblivion Effaces Him
Wednesday, 17 March 2021
The Castleton Report
"I think it's a wonderful story though totally madcap." — David Castleton
The following claims by David Castleton in his article of 9 December 2018 are either false, unsubstantiated, fabricated, embellished beyond all recognition, or do not stand up to any form of examination whatsoever.
"Vampire hunters claimed to have broken open coffins, and plunged stakes into – and even burnt – the corpses of the ‘undead’."
Nobody made such a claim, and nothing of the sort happened.
"But another local young man with an interest in the supernatural, Sean Manchester, was intrigued by what he read [about Farrant]."
†Seán Manchester had been investigating the case since the 1960s, and, far from being intrigued by what he read in the readers' letters' column of the Hampstead & Highgate Express, warned against Farrant's ambitions, both in the aforementioned local newspaper and on television on 13 March 1970.
"Though Farrant had never claimed the dark figure he’d encountered was a vampire."
Farrant did claim the figure he encountered was a vampire in his earliest television interviews. See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bahSRljtG9E
"Manchester alleged that ‘a King Vampire of the undead’ ... etc"
This piece of journalistic embellishment was challenged the moment it was employed by the newspaper's editor, as revealed in one of †Seán Manchester's books that deal with the topic.
"One film – the Hammer Horror production Taste the Blood of Dracula – had actually been shot in Highgate Cemetery just a year before the Highgate Vampire incidents began."
Taste the Blood of Dracula (7 May 1970) was shot over two days in broad daylight. No scenes were filmed after dusk. The Highgate Vampire incidents began, as confirmed in †Seán Manchester's book of the same name, in early 1967. Other researchers, eg Peter Underwood, recorded even earlier incidents of a vampire presence in the same decade, ie the 1960s..
"Farrant, meanwhile, still unconvinced the spooky presence was a nosferatu, complained that media hysteria and local superstition had turned the Highgate entity into a vampire."
David Farrant's interviews on television in 1970 confirm he believed the entity to be a vampire. He was arrested around midnight in Highgate Cemetery by police on the night of August 17th, armed with a cross, rosary and a wooden stake. In press interviews at the time he confirms his intention of impaling the vampire with a wooden stake. In later years, he revised this claim considerably.
"Both Farrant’s and Manchester’s entourages were groups of young people led by charismatic young men."
There is no reason to suppose that those associated with †Seán Manchester's pursuit of the Highgate phenomenon were "young people"; in fact, some were older than †Seán Manchester and, equally, some were not. †Seán Manchester was in his late mid-twenties when he first hit the headlines.
"Their escapades did include breaking and entering, vandalism etc."
Farrant was convicted of vandalism, but the accusation is being levelled at both by David Castleton. †Seán Manchester has no criminal convictions whatsoever. Castleton's claim is therefore libellous.
"The name Lucy (Lucia) is also connected with the secondary infestation in the Great Northern London Cemetery."
The identity of the female was not revealed, and has still not been revealed. Castleton fails to get the nom de plume †Seán Manchester gave her in his book correct. The pseudonym is Lusia, not "Lucia."
"Still, it would seem that much of the Highgate Vampire mythos may well have been moulded by the propensities of local youngsters for legend tripping and ostentation."
Due to a total lack of proper research, David Castleton assumes rather than knows.
"Local youngsters" might have assembled in Swains Lane after the broadcast on television by †Seán Manchester on 13 March 1970, but even that crowd were by no means all young. The schoolteacher, Alan Blood, who was among them and featured on the front page of a national newspaper the next day, could hardly be described as a youngster. There is a propensity on the part of David Castleton to project his own agenda, which is hostile to the facts found on public record, and testimonies by witnesses that were taped or filmed at the time. Some of the crowd that assembled outside Highgate Cemetery's north gate on that fateful night can be seen in this photograph. All adults.